Realist vs Visionary (+7 other comparisons)

In this article we discuss realist vs visionary people. There are different personality styles, but some are totally different from each other like realist vs visionary.

Visionary vs Realist

The difference between a visionary vs realist is that while a visionary might see things and omagine what they could be, and then work towards achieving that, a realist might be someone who focuses more on the here and now and the concrete things that can be done with the resources at hand. Visionary vs realist is also specified in that visionaries may be dreamers while realists are more doers.

Realists vs visionaries  have different visions and thinking patterns of their life . 

Before we discuss the realist vs visionary, we will discuss realist vs visionary people in detail.

A realist sees the world as it is which means that he believes in physical conditions more than imaginary. 

A realist has a nature of seeing all the possibilities involved in raising an issue with an objective eye.

 Realist people do not get fluctuated by their unconscious biases or their idealist objectives which can easily sway people.

Instead, realist people search and seek the truth and prefer it to be simple. 

We’ll discuss the characteristics of these two personalities.

Moreover, how they are similar and different from each other (Realist vs Visionary) will also be discussed in detail in the article given below. 

Realist people notice the actions and flow which is happening around them. 

These people, mostly, like to recount the events about those things which they have experienced not necessarily being funny or have a point and just happened to them. 

They notice the activities and behaviour of others. Conventional people, generally, who abide by the norms and ethics of society like to keep themselves updated with latest trends and popular fashions.

Now we discuss the Realist vs visionary people.  

Additionally, you can also read about the difference between realist and idealist.

Realistic personality type

 Before we discuss the realist vs visionary people, we should also know about realistic people.

People of this personality type prefer to use their eyes and hands for exploring the world around them and complete their tasks. 

These people are more likely to be involved in physical, mechanical and outdoor occupation and activities.

These people tend to enjoy working with physical objects, machines, tools, animals and plants instead of thinking of ideas, analysing data and people. 

Realist personality type people feel confident while working with their bodies and relating to the physical world.

Athletic and mechanical skills of these people are usually strong and they are well organised. 

A realist person will love to solve concrete problems rather than playing with abstract problems doing things which involve bodies. 

As these people have capability of dealing with physical objects, due to this ability these people are mostly adequate in case of emergency. 

A person of this personality type can easily deal with physical realities of this world which imply that these people are mostly practical, independent, aggressive, conservative and strong.

These people are not good with their communication skills and thus they strive to be perfect.

Side Note: I grew this blog to over 500,000 monthly pageviews and it now finances our charitable missions. If you are looking to start a blog as a source of income or to help your community then view our how to start a blog guide.

What is a realist? The traits of Realists

There are various qualities and personality traits which can be related to realists.

These people are clear in their intentions and directions, they are non judgmental, grounded, objective and they are able to extract facts from fiction.

Realists’ sense of perception is exceptional.  

Life events look crystal clear to realists because they have the ability to foresee the results from different situations.

As these people see things in an exact way as they are present in this world therefore they do not get distorted by the interpretation of things otherwise. 

These people tend to focus on this world in which there are countless events happening in a series with a lot of varieties and they approve of it. These people see the world through action as it happens.

Event itself is more important than its meanings and moods within an action. 

Possible Signs of being Realist

Before we discuss the realist vs visionary people, we should also know about  the traits of realistic people

  1. Planning Wisely

These people are good at planning anything or any event. For example, when they have to plan a trip, a dinner date, an outing with friends or family or any other event.

When it comes to planning these people are considered suitable and given command of planning and execution. Because they know to make plans with a sense of responsibility and wisdom.

This implies that these people believe in being practical in whatever the responsibility is given to them and they will execute the plan with intelligence and wisdom which will be satisfactory for everyone.

These people can comply with the expectations of everyone because they know the boundaries of compromise for entertaining activities.

Additionally, they have their preparations complete for the difficulties they may face in their plan. And if their first plan does not work they will always have another suitable plan to keep everyone happy. 

  1. Independent and Stable

Realist people are mostly identified as independent and stable as compared to other people in their circle. These people think with clarity in mind and logistically.

These people tend to avoid some gatherings because their personality type prefers to live and work independently with interruptions.

  1. Doers

These people are termed as doers because they are always upto the task solving complex problems frequently. These people enjoy doing practical work which is based on reality principles.

For example with those things which can be seen and touched physically.

These people find comfort in studying subjects like, animals, plants, mechanics and tools because these are physical objects which can be observed easily.

In fact, these people enjoy working on things rather than working on humans and ideas. They prefer nature and outdoors in their work. 

  1. Reliable

Being friends with realists can provide a sense of reliability. These people are very humble, practical and sensible.

These people stay strong physically and love to be more adventurous than other people because they find it more joyful when their bodies come to action while exploring the world around them.

Although, these people may seem to be typical, reserved and cautious but they will not refrain or pull out from doing activities due to these factors.

In fact, their caustios nature is helpful for them to explore the world better. 

A person with a realistic personality type might term himself as self-reliant, consistent, practical and handy.

Most things have a clear explanation or situation as things seem very simple to them.

If something is more complex and does not seem to have a possible solution then they will try to avoid it altogether.

These people tend to build friendship with those people who also have qualities similar to them. Because these people lack patience and tolerance for those behaviours which don’t make sense.

These people prefer to be with those who have a common sense, practicality and dependability.

These people are quiet nature and due to this someone can not listen to them shouting loudly but a sense of discomfort can be, however felt easily.

Preferred Work Environments for Realistic Personality Types

Both realist vs visionary people prefer different work environments. Many people find it easy to survive in such environments where it complies with their personality type.

For the people with realistic personality types it is generally a well organised environment which is suitable and appropriate for their personality traits.

Organisations try to make clear lines of authority to ensure the possibility of work being simple and straightforward for these people.

Working outdoors and following a routine and clear directions are suitable professional settings for the people of this type. 

Typical Occupations for Realistic Personality Types

Both realist vs visionary people prefer different work occupations.

A person who has been identified as having the realist personality type will most likely be successful in the areas of manufacturing and engineering where they get clear cut directions and guidelines as well as measured goals.

Realist people value order and logic which hold immense importance in these organisations as well. Forestry and wildlife may attract these people for an outdoor position.

National Parks in the US provide balanced and suitable working conditions for those people who wish to remain in order and engage in physical activities. 

If a realist person gets a job offered to him which is very unlike the above mentioned conditions it may worsen the situation for them.

Due to this particular reason these people are found in those work environments which are mentioned above where there is an order, purpose and structure.

For these reasons, organisations are willing to hire such people with this personality type because they have a tendency to be reliable and provide quality services. 

To understand realist vs visionary, now we will discuss Visionary people. 

Idealism vs realism

When we speak about realism and realist meaning, we also have to define idealistic thinking.  

The idealist definition is  that of a perfectionist after he has managed to “do” good. An idealist identifies with what he does, not what he is.

He asks for the impossible, because it is utopian to believe that you can find perfection in the material world, more precisely in the physical, emotional and mental world.

An idealist is a person who aspires to an ideal, a person devoid of a sense of reality, of a practical spirit. 

Rather than criticizing oneself, an idealist criticizes others from their environment, who are not “so perfect,” according to their criteria.

Thus, an idealist often lives in an inner rage, rarely letting it out, so as not to seem “imperfect”. 

Visionaries

This personality type is among those 16 various personality types which were discovered by Myers-Briggs Type Indicator.

People with a visionary personality type are usually expressive, innovative and clever thinkers. Psychologist David Keirsey, the founder of the Keirsey Temperament Sorter, have suggested that these people are approximately two to five percent of all. 

Characteristics of Visionaries

To understand realist vs visionary, now we will discuss  the characteristics of Visionary people. 

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator have analysed personality in four key 

The MBTI analysis personality in four key proportions

  • Extroversion and Introversion
  •  Sensing and Intuition
  •  Thinking and Feeling
  •  Perceiving and Judging.
  1. Extraverted

These people find it easy and pleasant to interact with other people from different backgrounds. These people enjoy debating and engaging people in conversations. 

  1. Intuitive

These people focus on the future instead of focusing on what is with them.

They will work on those assignments which will never be finished because they always focus on the broader perspectives instead of present needs.

  1. Thinking

These people are objective and logical. These people focus more on rational evidence rather than on emotional and subjective information while making a decision.

  1. Perceiving

Visionaries people tend to hold discretion. The course of action is based on the strategy of wait and see rather than making decisions or taking practical measures.

Few of the common traits of these people include:

  1. They are Innovative
  2. They are always full ideas and are creative minded. 
  3. They can have excellent conversations. 
  4. They find it pleasant to debate with other people. 
  5. They put greater stress on knowledge. 
  6. They hate routines and schedules. 
  7. These people are good leaders.
  8. These people hate to be controlled by others. 
  9. They are logical. 

As these people are known to be extroverts, it is not surprising that these people are very good at acquiring skills.

Visionary has got excellent communication skills which enables them to engage in interaction with different people from their families, friends and colleagues.

While talking to other people, they are found to be intelligent with a great presence of mind. These people will get indulged in debating with others because they enjoy exchanging views and ideas.

Usually their quest for debating can lead these people to be the devil’s advocate which can lead them to be involved in a conflict with other people who think that they are being deliberately aggressive and adversary. 

Visionary personality type is known as innovators  and visionaries and the explorers because they are idea oriented.

However, while thinking these people can show no interest in the immediate details as compared to coming up with new theories and ideas.

This is the reason why they are always full of new ideas and without actually having no planning to execute their ideas and plans to convert their ideas into reality. 

In short both realist vs visionary, are both creative and innovators. Both are important but share different personality traits.

Realist vs Idealist

Realist vs idealist refers to the difference between someone who focuses on the real aspects of the situation and an idealist is someone who expects and hopes for the most ideal things that might happen regardless of the real aspects of a condition.

Generally speaking, the Realist vs idealist debate may be settled in a similar way as realist vs visionary, which means that we may want to look at how each type approaches challenges or how they tackle new information.

Realist vs idealist debate can also be approached from the perspective of how each type figures out solutions to problems or comes up with life plans and execute strategy.

When look at things from these perspectives, it may become quite clear that in a realist vs idealist comparison, a realist might try to focus on plans and goals and be more involved in using facts and figures, and try to keep themselves to the mere factual basis of the problem, whereas an idealist might try to consider wider pictures and may let their emotions intervene, and they may often take the more optimistic approach to things, hoping that the situation would resolve itself and asking for assistance if it doesn’t.

There is another type of distinction between realist and idealist, and that is in foreign policy, where there are two major approaches to solving problems and approaching conflict, Realist and Idealist.

According to the American diplomacy website: “First, a “realist” foreign policy places national interests and security above ideology, ethics and morality. The second or “idealist” school posits that foreign policy must reflect the ethical, moral and philosophical values of the country.”

This website explores in depth the use of both realism and idealism in the American foreign policy, and says the following on both:

“Under Woodrow Wilson, “Idealist” foreign policy did not accomplish what it was designed to do which was to eliminate wars in Europe after WWI. As a result, there have been modifications, which have approached the problem by creating international mechanisms like NATO, the UN, and GATT. That seems to be working a bit better as we have not had a third world war in Europe.”

“During that period we have vacillated between a “realist” foreign policy that purports to reflect our national interests and an “idealist” policy that purports to reflect our higher values. Changes in administrations, and this policy, have resulted in a practical, observable ambivalence.”

“The success of any country’s foreign policy lies at least partly in its consistency and in the ability of other nations to “read” that policy on a long-term basis. In that regard, an ambivalent policy is absolutely the hardest to read and deal with.”

As one might see from the excerpts above, the excess of neither realism or idealism works in complicated situations, and sometimes the problem calls for a joint sort of effort that takes into account both perspectives.

Realist vs Optimist

The key difference between a realist vs optimist is that while a realist may focus more on the reality and expect things to turn out the way current factors would predict, an optimist might ignore some of the factors and expect, or hope for, the best thing to happen.

The difference between a realist vs an optimist may also make itself clear in the way they approach information, and it may be seen that while a realist takes in all the information they can from their environment and consider the various things that go into an outcome, an optimist might often take selective information or not take enough at all, hoping for the best thing to happen and banking more on remaining positive.

Another difference between a realist and an optimist is that a realist might make a decision about what kind of outcome might occur, whereas  the optimist may lay more premium on other factors as well.

Realist vs Optimist can also be understood in terms of expectation, and it may be seen that while an optimist is expecting good things to happen, or for things to turn out well, and this may not always be based on evidence but an optimist may still look at the negative things around them and hope for the best regardless of the negativity, whereas a realist is not always negative, they merely focus on the information that exists currently and work off that.

Realist vs Pessimist

Realist vs pessimist can be explained by knowing that while a realist is someone who does not focus on the positive or negative, just on the facts and information they have, a pessimist focuses only on the negative and ignores not only the positive, but also the facts, on occasion.

The debate about realist vs pessimist exists because many people think that realists are just pessimists in disguise, and a realist may be anyone that just does not think positively enough.

This, however, is not true, and even though many people seem like pessimists when they always focus on the current issues or trends, the truth is that because they focus solely on the information they have, they may not be full of hope and expectation all the time, which gets confused for pessimism.

Realist vs pessimist debate can also be settled by understanding that the reason pessimists tend to expect a bad thing to happen but consider themselves realists for doing so, might be that there are in fact bad things happening in the world all the time, and that makes it extremely likely for someone to feel like they are basing their negative view of the future on reality.

At the same time, if you are struggling with understanding where you fall in the realist vs pessimist debate, you may benefit from knowing that a true realist knows that there are good things in the world too, and they don’t have any trouble accepting that there can be good things too, and they may have a keen sense of observation because they want to be aware of all the possibilities all the time.

Realist vs Constructivist

The primary difference between realist vs constructivist lies in the approach to ideas, meaning that while a constructivist may demand that the role of ideas in world politics be taken seriously, a realist might completely disregard it.

A realist is someone who might be action-oriented and very based in the concrete realities around them, meaning that they will almost always focus on the facts and figures and the truth of the situation which is observable and tangible, however, a constructivist might be someone that focuses more on the ideas and what things could be, while hoping or expecting neither the best, nor the worst.

Realists vs constructivists can also be understood through their approaches to politics and world relations, where while Constructivists might argue that states can have multiple identities that are socially constructed through interaction with other actors, realists might argue that any and all identities and interactions that are possible are the ones that are observable and that exist in the current moment.

Additionally, the debate between realist vs constructivist can also be understood by understanding what identity means in this context, and while constructivists might consider the identities are representations of an actor’s understanding of who they are, which in turn signals their interests, the realist might not go that deep, and consider identities of individuals to be just their behaviors and their basic understanding of what they are responding to, which may often be the societal factors that act on them.

Realist vs Pragmatist

The main difference between realist vs pragmatist is that while a realist is someone who functions based on the information they have received from their environment, a pragmatist might be someone who acts based on the possible consequences of their actions, and who base their actions in practical matters.

Many people find the difference between realists vs pragmatists difficult to understand, because both seem to be grounded in the true reality without involving any ideals or beliefs, but there are some key differences.

For one thing, realists vs pragmatists can be approached through while the person does what they do, and one might find that while a realist mostly responds to some factor in their society, and are likely to form their beliefs based on reality, a pragmatist might often take action based on where things are going, and they may not be too concerned with beliefs at all.

It is common understanding that a pragmatist is often someone who can go against their beliefs too, if the citation demands it, for instance, someone stealing bread because they are hungry, but the realist might not be able to do so because their realist beliefs tell them that it is certain that they will be punished for it in some way because that is just how reality works.

Realist vs Relativist Ontology

Realist vs relativist are both considered as being based in ontology because both seem to concern the nature of reality or existence, and while realists may consider only the facts and realities, relativists might consider things relative to reality rather than based in reality.

Ontology is a branch of study that deals exclusively with the existence of facts and objects, and Ontological theories are based on either accepting the facts as they are or rejecting them for a more enhanced ideology.

The difference between realist vs relativist from an ontology perspective is based on whether someone believes in the facts as they exist independent of the human mind and experience or whether they don’t.

Therefore, the difference between realist vs Relativist ontology is the belief that reality is a finite subjective experience and nothing exists outside of our thoughts but Reality from a relativist perspective might not be distinguishable from the subjective experience of it.

The ontology based difference between realist vs relativist boils down, quite simply, to how we observe the reality around us, process it, and absorb it before we let it affect our actions.

Realist vs Anti-Realist

Realist vs Anti-Realist are positions described in ontology and philosophy, and the most difference between realist vs anti-realist is that if you accept facts are real independently of the human mind or experience you are a realist, and you accept that reality is only subjective and based on human experience of it, you are an anti-realist.

Realist vs anti-realist are mostly conditions that come up in ontology, and they are usually things positions people take when they talk about how they view society or the experience of things in society.

Being a realist may mean that someone will think of things that exist as independent entities that will exist and be the same regardless of how we view them, and they may be individuals who think of facts and figures as the only things that matter and base their actions on the reality alone.

On the other hand anti-realists might be individuals who place more importance in the experience of reality and the facts as they are, rather than take everything at face value and deny the value of humanity altogether, and while they may act based on reality and the facts as they are, they still consider humanness a huge factor in whatever they think or do about their reality.

Realist vs Liberalist

Realist vs liberalist is a distinction often made in the context of International Relations theory, and here realist refers to someone who deals mainly with security and material power, but Liberalism might refer to a focus on economic interdependence and domestic-level factors as well.

Realist vs liberalist debate is worthwhile to get into when talking about foreign policy and how countries deal with each other on a regular basis, because the world is interconnected and actions of each country affect other countries fairly often.

Distinctions between realist vs liberalist are even more important to understand when there is talk of trade deals and a need to understand the political leanings of a neighbour country or a region that is facing conflict, because the realist or liberalist leaning of a country’s government can often make important differences to outcomes.

Liberalism maintains that state preferences are the primary determinant for the eventual behavior of a state, and not the state capabilities, but in realism the state might be seen as a unitary actor and the capabilities or needs of the state might take precedence over all else.

The difference between realist vs liberalist is also seen in whether the state focuses more on the unitary actions of the citizens of the state, or whether they allow for plurality in state actions, or look at the state as a whole. 

Realist vs liberalist preferences usually vary from state to state, and they may depend on factors such as culture, economic system or government type. 

Realist vs Relativist

Realist vs relativist is a distinction between how people assess the situations in their life, and if they focus on the facts and information regardless of subjectivity, they may be a realist, while someone who is a Relativist might argue that the world is created by the human mind, and all facts may be considered in accordance with the human experience as well.

The primary difference between realist vs relativist may also be understood in the fact that the realist approach is ‘no more rational or trustworthy than ordinary thinking’ meaning that what is stated is relative to the state of the individual and the context it is said in is solely based on the real situations around them,

Realism vs relativism is a debate that is most relevant in philosophy and in psychology, but while in philosophy it may be something that is a concept to approach how someone views the world around them, and in psychology it may be what drives the scientific research and the understanding of human behavior.

Realism is often considered ‘mainstream’ psychology, and it may be said that in realism based psychology knowledge about the world might be acquired through methodical and systematic experimentation, and it is often considered to be a cornerstone of scientific study.

The Relativism aspect of realist vs relativist however, refers to an alternative approach to realism and it argues that the world is created by the human mind, and the value of human experience is more important than just what is seen by the person.

Realist vs visionary

In this article we found out the realist meaning, and what a visionary person is like. 

A realistic person sees things as they are. It does not tip the scales in seeing experience more pleasant than it is, but no less pleasant, as a pessimist would do.

She will accept the good events and the bad events in her life, uninfluenced by optimism or pessimism.

To be known as a visionary person you have to act, not just talk. Everyone has ideas. Ideas are cheap. Talking is even cheaper.

We all listen to what the great thinkers tell us, because their ideas have been successfully validated. 

A visionary person without a platform is like a tree that falls in the forest, without making any noise.

When you prove that your vision is valid, gaining recognition for visionary thinking becomes much easier to accomplish.

Side Note: I have tried and tested various products and services to help with my anxiety and depression. See my top recommendations here, as well as a full list of all products and services our team has tested for various mental health conditions and general wellness.

FAQs about Realist vs Visionary Personality

What is a realist personality type?

Realist personality type refers to being independent and practical.

What makes a person realist?

A realist is someone who looks at the things as they are present.

What is the main goal of realism?

The main objective of realism is to present life as it is.

What is a visionary personality type?

People with a visionary personality type are usually expressive, innovative and clever thinkers.

What are the notorious examples of visionary people?

Thomas Edison, inventor

John Adams, U.S. president

Theodore Roosevelt, U.S. president

What is a pragmatist?

A pragmatic person is someone who has focused rather on reality and facts and consequences than on the imaginary world.

Politicians invoke pragmatism as a kind of ultimate attribute of competence.

In everyday life, everyone wants to be as applied as possible, to solve problems and, therefore, to be as pragmatic as possible. 

References

workbloom.com/job-search/riasec-personality-type-realistic-doers

onlinepersonalitytests.org/personality-test/entp/

cognifit.com/what-is-a-realist-8-signs-to-tell-if-you-have-a-realist-personality/

Was this post helpful?